NeuroRehab Team
Tuesday, June 17th, 2025
Functional electrical stimulation (FES) has been used in stroke rehabilitation for decades. Yet outcomes vary widely depending on how and when it is applied.
Electrical stimulation alone does not drive recovery. Movement alone does not always restore function.
When FES is combined with task-specific training, however, it becomes a powerful tool for promoting neuroplastic change.
This article outlines five evidence-based ways to integrate FES with task-specific practice in stroke rehabilitation and explains why this combination matters.
FES activates muscles through electrical impulses, allowing movement to occur when voluntary control is limited.
Task-specific training teaches the brain how to use that movement in meaningful contexts.
Together, they reinforce the relationship between motor intent, sensory feedback, and functional performance.
This pairing aligns with principles of neuroplasticity, motor learning, and use-dependent recovery.
One of the most effective uses of FES is to assist finger extension or wrist movement during functional reach and grasp tasks.
Rather than stimulating muscles in isolation, FES should be timed with goal-directed activities such as:
This reinforces the brain’s association between intent and outcome.
Repetition is essential for neuroplastic change, but repetition without quality can reinforce inefficient patterns.
FES can help guide movement during high-repetition practice by:
This allows patients to perform more repetitions with better alignment to the intended task.
After stroke, many individuals avoid using the affected limb due to weakness or early failure.
FES can lower the barrier to movement, encouraging active attempts and reducing reliance on the unaffected side.
When paired with task-specific activities, this helps counter learned non-use and supports long-term engagement.
Neuroplasticity is driven by relevance.
Using FES during real-life tasks such as dressing, grooming, or meal preparation increases carryover beyond the clinic.
This approach shifts stimulation from an exercise tool to a functional learning tool.
As voluntary control improves, FES parameters should be adjusted to avoid over-assistance.
Progression may include:
This ensures the nervous system remains challenged and engaged.
FES is less effective when:
FES should support learning, not replace it.
Combining FES with task-specific training strengthens the connection between intention, movement, and sensory feedback.
This integration promotes:
When applied correctly, FES becomes a catalyst for recovery rather than a standalone modality.
For clinicians looking to deepen their understanding of how to use functional electrical stimulation effectively, we offer a free continuing education course focused on integrating FES with task-specific training.
The course covers:
If you’re ready to implement FES in your practice, sign up for our free AOTA-approved CEU. You’ll learn practical applications, protocols, and the latest research in using FES for stroke recovery.
Register here for free access to the CEU course.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.